FR
CCMassurancestable

Collaborative Continuous Monitoring

The Collaborative Continuous Monitoring rules help agencies use shared, current authorization information from providers as part of each agency's own Information Security Continuous Monitoring strategy. These rules reduce unnecessary manual burden by encouraging automated monitoring and review while allowing each agency to make its own risk-based decisions about ongoing authorization.

Agency GuidanceAGM

4 rules

These rules for agencies apply to all agencies using a FedRAMP Certification.

Types20xRev5
PathsProgramAgency
ClassesBCD
AffectsAgencies
CCM-AGM-NAR

No Additional Requirements

MUST NOT

Agencies MUST NOT place additional security requirements on cloud service providers beyond those required by FedRAMP UNLESS the head of the agency or an authorized delegate makes a determination that there is a demonstrable need for such; this does not apply to seeking clarification or asking general questions about FedRAMP Certification Data.

This is a statutory requirement in 44 USC § 3613 (e) related to the Presumption of Adequacy for a FedRAMP Certification.
CCM-AGM-ROR

Review Ongoing Reports

MUST

Agencies MUST review each Ongoing Certification Report to understand how changes to the cloud service offering may impact the previously agreed-upon risk tolerance documented in the agency's Authorization to Operate of a federal information system that includes the cloud service offering in its boundary.

This is required by 44 USC § 35, OMB A-130, FIPS-200, and M-24-15.

Ongoing Certification ReportsOCR

7 rules

These rules for Ongoing Certification Reports apply to providers with any type of FedRAMP Certification.

Types20xRev5
PathsProgramAgency
ClassesBCD
AffectsProviders
CCM-OCR-AFS

Anonymized Feedback Summary

MUST

Providers MUST supply an anonymized and desensitized summary of the feedback, questions, and answers about each Ongoing Certification Report as an addendum to the Ongoing Certification Report OR in the next Ongoing Certification Report.

This is intended to encourage sharing of information and decrease the burden on the cloud service provider - providing this summary will reduce duplicate questions from agencies and ensure FedRAMP has access to this information. It is generally in the provider's interest to update this addendum frequently throughout the quarter.

Required Artifacts

  • How the summary will be delivered
CCM-OCR-AVL

Report Availability

MUST

Providers MUST supply an Ongoing Certification Report to all necessary parties every 3 months, covering the entire period since the previous summary, in a consistent format that is human readable; this report MUST include high-level summaries of at least the following information:

  • Changes to FedRAMP Certification Data
  • Planned changes to FedRAMP Certification Data during at least the next 3 months
  • Accepted vulnerabilities
  • Transformative changes
  • Updated recommendations or best practices for security, configuration, usage, or similar aspects of the cloud service offering
  • A list of all agencies that are directly using the product
  • FedRAMP Reportable Incidents or an attestation that no such incidents occurred
  • Lessons learned and changes planned or made as a result of FedRAMP Reportable Incidents (if such occurred)

Required Artifacts

  • Most recent Ongoing Certification Report. If the report is not available, the provider MUST provide a sample report that includes all required information.
  • How the report will be delivered
CCM-OCR-SOR

Spread Out Reports

SHOULD

Providers SHOULD establish a regular 3 month cycle for Ongoing Certification Reports that is spread out from the beginning, middle, or end of each quarter.

This recommendation is intended to discourage hundreds of cloud service providers from releasing their Ongoing Certification Reports during the first or last week of each quarter because that is the easiest way for a single provider to track this deliverable; the result would overwhelm agencies with many cloud services. Widely used cloud service providers are encouraged to work with their customers to identify ideal timeframes for this cycle.

Quarterly ReviewsQTR

10 rules

These rules for Quarterly Reviews apply to providers with any type of FedRAMP Certification.

Types20xRev5
PathsProgramAgency
ClassesBCD
AffectsProviders
CCM-QTR-ACT

Additional Content

SHOULD

Providers SHOULD supply additional information in Quarterly Reviews that the provider determines is of interest, use, or otherwise relevant to agencies.

CCM-QTR-MTG

Quarterly Review Meeting

ClassRequirement
A
MAYEvery 3 months

Providers with Class A Certifications MAY host a synchronous Quarterly Review every 3 months, open to all necessary parties, to review aspects of the most recent Ongoing Certification Reports that the provider determines are of the most relevance to agencies.

B
SHOULDEvery 3 months

Providers with Class B Certifications SHOULD host a synchronous Quarterly Review every 3 months, open to all necessary parties, to review aspects of the most recent Ongoing Certification Reports that the provider determines are of the most relevance to agencies.

C
MUSTEvery 3 months

Providers with Class C Certifications MUST host a synchronous Quarterly Review every 3 months, open to all necessary parties, to review aspects of the most recent Ongoing Certification Reports that the provider determines are of the most relevance to agencies.

D
MUSTEvery 3 months

Providers with Class D Certifications MUST host a synchronous Quarterly Review every 3 months, open to all necessary parties, to review aspects of the most recent Ongoing Certification Reports that the provider determines are of the most relevance to agencies.

CCM-QTR-REG

Meeting Registration Info

MUST

Providers MUST supply either a registration link or a downloadable calendar file with meeting information for Quarterly Reviews to all necessary parties.

Required Artifacts

  • URL to the registration page or calendar file.
CCM-QTR-RTP

Restrict Third Parties

SHOULD NOT

Providers SHOULD NOT invite third parties to attend Quarterly Reviews intended for agencies unless they have specific relevance.

This is because agencies are less likely to actively participate in meetings with third parties; the cloud service provider's independent assessor should be considered relevant by default.
CCM-QTR-SRR

Share Recordings Responsibly

MAY

Providers MAY responsibly supply recordings or transcriptions of Quarterly Reviews to the public or other parties ONLY if the provider removes all agency information (comments, questions, names, etc.) AND determines doing so will NOT likely have an adverse effect on the cloud service offering.